Psychology insights

17 August 2026 · 7 minute read

Can EMDR and Schema Therapy be used together?

EMDR and Schema Therapy can be integrated around a clear formulation, while direct research on the combined approach remains much more limited than the evidence for the individual treatments.

Editorial illustration of two therapeutic streams joining into one carefully mapped pathway

The work each approach addresses

EMDR is recommended for adult PTSD in Australian and international guidelines, and includes assessment, preparation, target selection and review alongside memory processing. During processing, a person brings aspects of a distressing memory to mind while undertaking a dual-attention task, often involving eye movements.

Schema Therapy considers longstanding emotional themes and coping states that may have developed around experiences of safety, worth, trust and unmet needs. It combines cognitive and behavioural work with imagery, chair work and attention to the therapy relationship.

A rationale for integration

A distressing memory may be connected with broader expectations about powerlessness, harm or responsibility that remain active in current relationships. EMDR might address particular memories while schema methods help identify coping modes or self-blame that interfere with processing or continue outside it.

For example, memory-focused work on an assault may sit alongside schema work on submission and boundaries, while mode language may help a person recognise detachment during processing. Each method still needs a specific purpose, so that the treatment plan explains what is being targeted and how the clinician will assess change.

Planning the sequence

Some people may begin with schema formulation and preparation before selecting EMDR targets, while others can start trauma-focused treatment earlier and address recurring relational responses later. The approaches may also alternate when the reason for changing methods is clear to both clinician and client.

A 2025 review of phase-based treatment for adults with childhood trauma found no advantage over trauma-focused therapy alone across a small number of eligible studies. The limited evidence leaves preparation to be guided by assessed needs, including whether the person can remain sufficiently present and safe to engage in the proposed work.

Direct evidence for the combination

EMDR has a considerably stronger evidence base as a PTSD treatment than the specific combination of EMDR and Schema Therapy. Schema Therapy has supportive trials and meta-analyses for personality disorders and some chronic presentations, while integration has mostly been described through theory, clinical accounts and small studies.

A 2025 publication reported a phased course of Schema Therapy, imagery rescripting and EMDR for one person with complex PTSD, with improvements in symptoms and schemas over treatment. A single case can describe how the work was organised but cannot determine which components caused improvement, whether each was necessary or how the sequence would generalise.

Agreeing on an integrated plan

A psychologist proposing both methods should be competent in each and able to explain the memories or patterns they intend to address. That conversation should include how progress will be measured and what would lead to slowing down, choosing another target or using a different method.

Because comparative evidence for the combination remains limited, review needs to keep returning to the individual treatment response. The formulation should help make those decisions explicit, rather than allowing the presence of two recognised treatment names to stand in for a rationale.

Research drawn on

  1. Phoenix Australia. Australian PTSD Guidelines: treatment recommendations. View source
  2. van Hemert MTC, de Jong PM, Bouwer TR, et al. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2025;16:2573616. Treating complex PTSD with Schema Therapy, imagery rescripting and EMDR: a review and case study. View source
  3. Svircevic CS, Berle D. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2025;213(12):339–345. Phase-based versus trauma-focused therapy for adult survivors of childhood trauma. View source
  4. Zhang K, Hu X, Ma L, et al. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2023. The efficacy of schema therapy for personality disorders. View source

AI disclosure

Brent Munro researched, wrote and reviewed this insight, with ChatGPT assisting in literature searches, limited research comparisons, editing and image generation. He retains full responsibility for the published content.

Related Axis services

Related reading